Never a dull moment when you have a Strummer in the house. Last night I turned around and spotted him sporting my purse. I guess he's secure in his manhood.
I'm not sure where the purse was or how (or why) he managed to get it around his neck but it's one more thing I'll have to keep an eye on because he could easily strangle himself. I'm amazed he's made it to nearly 10 without requiring surgery or some other medical intervention. Keeping this dog safe and alive has not been an easy task.
I'm going to see a Functional Movement Specialist later today to see if she can help me with my running for both agility and triathlon. I've been working my way through 'Ready to Run' and it's been interesting but also challenging because I have no idea if I'm doing the mobility exercises properly or if I've diagnosed my issues properly so that I'm focusing on the right exercises. I'm to a point where I feel like I need someone who knows what they're doing to watch what I'm doing, assess what my specific issues are and tell me exactly what I need to work on. Should be interesting, stay tuned.
Thursday, January 08, 2015
Monday, January 05, 2015
Holiday Hikes
Stupid Facebook, I've developed the habit of posting a few quick photos on Facebook and neglecting the blog. Well no longer. I've been neglecting Facebook for the past 2 months or so and it feels fantastic. I check it occasionally because people use it like email and I like to get my messages. I did feel bad when I checked after 2 days and found that a nice lady had taken some photos of Strummer at the last DOCNA trial and wanted my real email so she could send them to me. Hopefully she wasn't too put off that I took 2 days to respond. Other than that it feels liberating to be free of the place. I occasionally check my messages and whatever couple few posts are at the top of my feed and sometimes something like the Boulder Nordic Club to see if they've groomed the parks near my house or similar type groups to get info. on things. Facebook has it's purpose and place but for me the less I go there the better I feel.
Thanksgiving hike at Hall Ranch. It was t-shirt weather despite the snow on the ground at the higher elevations.
A smear of rainbow in the clouds over Hall Ranch.
Was expecting more snow over the twin peaks (Meeker and Longs).
Silly deer.
Christmas hike with Strummer at Walker Ranch. A light snow started falling while we were hiking but we made it back to the car before the big storm hit. Beautiful magical day.
Storm blowing in over Walker Ranch.
View of the plains below.
Silly Strum.
Practicing the dark art of diving rods or 'water witching'
Thanksgiving hike at Hall Ranch. It was t-shirt weather despite the snow on the ground at the higher elevations.
A smear of rainbow in the clouds over Hall Ranch.
Was expecting more snow over the twin peaks (Meeker and Longs).
Silly deer.
Christmas hike with Strummer at Walker Ranch. A light snow started falling while we were hiking but we made it back to the car before the big storm hit. Beautiful magical day.
Storm blowing in over Walker Ranch.
View of the plains below.
Silly Strum.
Practicing the dark art of diving rods or 'water witching'
And finally some in-town skiing at North Boulder Park after the storm. It was a perfect day except for the crowds that amassed. It wasn't too bad when I got there but I had to leave after 45 minutes or risk ending up on the 5:00 news. Boulder has reached the tipping point of Too Many People but that's a post for another day.
Saturday, January 03, 2015
Sitting in the Waiting Room
"I am a patient boy
I wait, I wait, I wait, I wait
My time is water down a drain
Everybody's moving
Everybody's moving
Everything is moving,
Moving, moving, moving
Please don't leave me to remain"
Fugazi - 'Waiting Room'
I don't normally pay too much attention to the end of the calendar year in terms of goal setting or accomplishments mostly because it's a period of down time for me. Not much going on triathlon wise in December and agility has no season so no natural time for large scale reflection especially since we didn't do any national events this year.
But I did have a huge accomplishment on New Year's Day, at least it felt like it to me, a good summing up of agility for the year. I rented some indoor ring time with my training partner since outdoors is a frozen snowy tundra and a pent up Border Collie is never a good thing. New places, especially indoors, are a challenge for Strummer even at nearly 10 years old. And my training partner has started running her new dog, a very fast exciting youngster. Especially if you're Strummer. He' been able to wait his turn with a loose leash, flat collar (ie no gentle leader), no treats while practicing in her backyard with her older dog for at least the past year, maybe even 2 or 3 years, hard to remember exactly when that miracle happened. For the entire rest of his life he's needed a gentle leader and my full attention when around any kind of agility practice or competition. Agility - so exciting! When I first got him and he was anywhere near a dog doing agility he'd be up on his hind legs screaming, kicking me with his front legs if I was stupid enough to try to body block him which I was stupid enough to try once. The bruises on my arms and legs were so bad that the chiropractor asked me if I'd taken up rugby. We spent his first agility class holed up in the equipment trailer working on 'calm' when it wasn't his turn. And I didn't even try to take him to a class until I'd been working with him for a couple few years and he was up to intermediate level handling.
Not the world's most relaxing dog.
New Year's Day practice started off with a return to Crazy. No barking or screaming but plenty of whining and trying to pull my arm out of its socket. Back to the gentle leader. Sigh. He turns 10 in March. At least he behaves in his gentle leader.
But after he'd had his turn and some time to cool down outside he calmed down enough to go on his flat collar for the rest of the practice. Here he is showing off his crazy mad 'waiting his turn' skills.
Yes, I know, a video of my dog standing there watching agility, I'm well aware of the absurdity.
I'm also well aware that he is anything but calm. The panting, the tongue flicks, the antsy prancing in place, the tension in the leash, etc. etc. etc. I get it that's he's not relaxed. But the other thing he's not is up on his hind legs scream barking and trying to dislocate my shoulder. Victory is mine.
I wait, I wait, I wait, I wait
My time is water down a drain
Everybody's moving
Everybody's moving
Everything is moving,
Moving, moving, moving
Please don't leave me to remain"
Fugazi - 'Waiting Room'
I don't normally pay too much attention to the end of the calendar year in terms of goal setting or accomplishments mostly because it's a period of down time for me. Not much going on triathlon wise in December and agility has no season so no natural time for large scale reflection especially since we didn't do any national events this year.
But I did have a huge accomplishment on New Year's Day, at least it felt like it to me, a good summing up of agility for the year. I rented some indoor ring time with my training partner since outdoors is a frozen snowy tundra and a pent up Border Collie is never a good thing. New places, especially indoors, are a challenge for Strummer even at nearly 10 years old. And my training partner has started running her new dog, a very fast exciting youngster. Especially if you're Strummer. He' been able to wait his turn with a loose leash, flat collar (ie no gentle leader), no treats while practicing in her backyard with her older dog for at least the past year, maybe even 2 or 3 years, hard to remember exactly when that miracle happened. For the entire rest of his life he's needed a gentle leader and my full attention when around any kind of agility practice or competition. Agility - so exciting! When I first got him and he was anywhere near a dog doing agility he'd be up on his hind legs screaming, kicking me with his front legs if I was stupid enough to try to body block him which I was stupid enough to try once. The bruises on my arms and legs were so bad that the chiropractor asked me if I'd taken up rugby. We spent his first agility class holed up in the equipment trailer working on 'calm' when it wasn't his turn. And I didn't even try to take him to a class until I'd been working with him for a couple few years and he was up to intermediate level handling.
Not the world's most relaxing dog.
New Year's Day practice started off with a return to Crazy. No barking or screaming but plenty of whining and trying to pull my arm out of its socket. Back to the gentle leader. Sigh. He turns 10 in March. At least he behaves in his gentle leader.
But after he'd had his turn and some time to cool down outside he calmed down enough to go on his flat collar for the rest of the practice. Here he is showing off his crazy mad 'waiting his turn' skills.
Yes, I know, a video of my dog standing there watching agility, I'm well aware of the absurdity.
I'm also well aware that he is anything but calm. The panting, the tongue flicks, the antsy prancing in place, the tension in the leash, etc. etc. etc. I get it that's he's not relaxed. But the other thing he's not is up on his hind legs scream barking and trying to dislocate my shoulder. Victory is mine.
Wednesday, December 03, 2014
Cheap Ass Continuing Education Following the Pareto Principle
Today is another Dog Agility Blog Event and we're discussing Continuing Education.
The Pareto principle, or 80-20 rule, states that roughly 80% of effects come from 20% of the causes. And when I think about all the seminars, books, DVD's, seminars, classes, magazines (did I mention seminars?) that I've ever bought, read, attended, etc. this holds true. Don't get me wrong, I love going to seminars and learning new stuff. Love it more than or at least as much as trialing. But I'd say that 80% of the useful stuff I've learned has come from 20% of the seminar presenters. And that precious little information that I've heard at seminars has actually worked its way into my training and even less into the ring. Let's be honest here, hands up who goes through their seminar notes from 4-5 years ago? Two years ago? Last year? Ever? I did finally wise up and shoot some video from one of the 20% seminar presenters and I have occasionally gone back and looked at that. Enormously useful. My notes? Can barely make heads or tails of them. And I take careful notes.
I'm also terribly guilty of charging on to learn new fancy handling maneuvers when my nearly 10 year old dog still struggles with weave pole entries. Because an enormous amount of effort has gone into those weave pole entries with little improvement. So why not let it go and practice something fun like that fancy blind cross serpentine move? And fess up people, I know I'm not alone, I see plenty of people struggling in the masters ring with super basic training/handling holes. I'm not judging here, I'm right there with you. But I wonder how much more gains I might get from just a little bit more effort with the basics?
I don't take lessons or go to a lot of seminars and I've never taken an online class mostly for economic reasons but also because after 15 years in the sport I'm not sure if the time/effort/money are going to give me big gains. I'm not for a second saying I know it all or that I have nothing to learn. There's loads to learn. Asstons. The sport has come so far and continues to progress at such a pace that I wonder if we'll soon have two tiers of agility (if we don't already). But I think there's value in taking time to practice, working on and reinforcing the basics as well as the fancy stuff, and perhaps most importantly of all, learning how to figure stuff out for ourselves. I work with a training partner and when something goes wrong we help each other troubleshoot. I learn from helping her almost as much as I learn going through the exercises myself. I've also learned how to spot stuff on my own, how to feel when I've done something wrong without needing a teacher or even a video camera. I'm not always right but I'm getting there. Seminars and the occasional lesson are super fun but it's these once a week little training sessions along with playing short little games with the weave poles and teeter (another issue that crops up if I don't keep on it) in my backyard that give me the 80% of results. Plus I love farting around, experimenting with things, why should the experts be the only ones who get to invent handling moves?
I also learn a lot from watching handling at trials. I don't typically experiment with a completely unpracticed move at a trial but I'll often go home and set up a similar scenario to practice something I saw someone else do. Or I may not like the exact handling move but it'll spark an idea of something to try. So much great stuff out there to learn from other people but I think we get the most bang for our time and effort by spending the time working with our dogs and learning how to learn for ourselves.
This post is part of the Dog Agility Dog Event. For more posts on Continuing Education go here.
The Pareto principle, or 80-20 rule, states that roughly 80% of effects come from 20% of the causes. And when I think about all the seminars, books, DVD's, seminars, classes, magazines (did I mention seminars?) that I've ever bought, read, attended, etc. this holds true. Don't get me wrong, I love going to seminars and learning new stuff. Love it more than or at least as much as trialing. But I'd say that 80% of the useful stuff I've learned has come from 20% of the seminar presenters. And that precious little information that I've heard at seminars has actually worked its way into my training and even less into the ring. Let's be honest here, hands up who goes through their seminar notes from 4-5 years ago? Two years ago? Last year? Ever? I did finally wise up and shoot some video from one of the 20% seminar presenters and I have occasionally gone back and looked at that. Enormously useful. My notes? Can barely make heads or tails of them. And I take careful notes.
I'm also terribly guilty of charging on to learn new fancy handling maneuvers when my nearly 10 year old dog still struggles with weave pole entries. Because an enormous amount of effort has gone into those weave pole entries with little improvement. So why not let it go and practice something fun like that fancy blind cross serpentine move? And fess up people, I know I'm not alone, I see plenty of people struggling in the masters ring with super basic training/handling holes. I'm not judging here, I'm right there with you. But I wonder how much more gains I might get from just a little bit more effort with the basics?
I don't take lessons or go to a lot of seminars and I've never taken an online class mostly for economic reasons but also because after 15 years in the sport I'm not sure if the time/effort/money are going to give me big gains. I'm not for a second saying I know it all or that I have nothing to learn. There's loads to learn. Asstons. The sport has come so far and continues to progress at such a pace that I wonder if we'll soon have two tiers of agility (if we don't already). But I think there's value in taking time to practice, working on and reinforcing the basics as well as the fancy stuff, and perhaps most importantly of all, learning how to figure stuff out for ourselves. I work with a training partner and when something goes wrong we help each other troubleshoot. I learn from helping her almost as much as I learn going through the exercises myself. I've also learned how to spot stuff on my own, how to feel when I've done something wrong without needing a teacher or even a video camera. I'm not always right but I'm getting there. Seminars and the occasional lesson are super fun but it's these once a week little training sessions along with playing short little games with the weave poles and teeter (another issue that crops up if I don't keep on it) in my backyard that give me the 80% of results. Plus I love farting around, experimenting with things, why should the experts be the only ones who get to invent handling moves?
I also learn a lot from watching handling at trials. I don't typically experiment with a completely unpracticed move at a trial but I'll often go home and set up a similar scenario to practice something I saw someone else do. Or I may not like the exact handling move but it'll spark an idea of something to try. So much great stuff out there to learn from other people but I think we get the most bang for our time and effort by spending the time working with our dogs and learning how to learn for ourselves.
This post is part of the Dog Agility Dog Event. For more posts on Continuing Education go here.
Thursday, November 20, 2014
Strength Training for the Lazy?
In my quest for More Strong I've stumbled across 'Body by Science', a high intensity weight training program which claims you can get all the exercise you need, both strength and cardiovascular, in just 12 minutes a week. The catch is that you're only supposed to do 12 minutes a week. For those who hate exercise and are pressed for time this is hardly a catch but for those like me who love to be active and outside a lot this is a prison sentence. But I'm intrigued. But I'm also feeling like how can I make this work? If you're doing a sport you're 'allowed' to work on skills during your recovery week but no more physical conditioning. Now to be fair this program is completely contra-indicative to triathlon training. The creator, Doug McGuff, is very much opposed to running and other forms of 'chronic cardio' and endurance sports. And I can't say as I don't share his concerns. Here's an interesting video by a cardiologist and runner.
And yes there are alternative points of view. But nonetheless I've been aware of the issues surrounding endurance training and heart health for at least 7-8 years now and it was instrumental in my switch from wanting to train for a half ironman to doing offroad/Xterra triathlons. In general the recommendations for most health benefits and least damage are no more than 12 hours per week of training and running should be 1-2 1/2 hours per week spread over 2-3 runs, 10-15 miles per week and no faster than 10 min/mile pace, though I believe sprint/interval training is supposed to be good. Now for me a 10 min./mile pace is near sprint pace but that's another post. Anyway, I'm not willing to give up these activities that I love but I am willing to sacrifice training for performance for training for health and I kept my training hours to around 10 hours per week for high volume weeks last summer with a couple weeks heading into the 12 hour range. This is not the sort of training that necessarily gets someone like me to the podium at Nationals but it's a good compromise of health/performance and I felt sufficiently pushed without being overtrained. The ultimate damage/benefit to my heart is a complete unknown.
So I'm not sure where this leaves me with the Body by Science protocol. It seems that I can continue to swim my skills/drills masters workouts. Maybe even include one USRPT/sprint workout? But running remains a black box. I was hoping to really focus on running this winter, especially form and it seems maybe I can do that but sprints/interval training are out of the question or maybe only once a week if I don't so my swim sprints. I'm going to give it a shot though. If I feel like I can handle it or I'm pushing myself towards overtraining I'll simply stop and go back to my regular weight training.
But one weight training session a week is so appealing. I hates weight training and now that I don't have my boot camp class it's all the more difficult to stay motivated.
And this sounds like it could be a great program for agility people looking to get into shape and/or people who hate to exercise or are very pressed for time. In perusing online forums and blogs about the program it seems that anecdotally there are people having success. Seems like the biggest issue is that the program is centered around the notion of pushing the muscle to failure and that for some people this can be difficult to achieve unless you have a coach or training partner at your session with you. And also that you can eventually develop an aversion to the training because it is so hard and unpleasant and this was my experience with the Tabata sprints experiment. Even though the workout was very short I'd start dreading it an hour beforehand. But I'm open minded here, mind over matter or whatever. I'm hoping to start this Saturday and I'll post updates.
And yes there are alternative points of view. But nonetheless I've been aware of the issues surrounding endurance training and heart health for at least 7-8 years now and it was instrumental in my switch from wanting to train for a half ironman to doing offroad/Xterra triathlons. In general the recommendations for most health benefits and least damage are no more than 12 hours per week of training and running should be 1-2 1/2 hours per week spread over 2-3 runs, 10-15 miles per week and no faster than 10 min/mile pace, though I believe sprint/interval training is supposed to be good. Now for me a 10 min./mile pace is near sprint pace but that's another post. Anyway, I'm not willing to give up these activities that I love but I am willing to sacrifice training for performance for training for health and I kept my training hours to around 10 hours per week for high volume weeks last summer with a couple weeks heading into the 12 hour range. This is not the sort of training that necessarily gets someone like me to the podium at Nationals but it's a good compromise of health/performance and I felt sufficiently pushed without being overtrained. The ultimate damage/benefit to my heart is a complete unknown.
So I'm not sure where this leaves me with the Body by Science protocol. It seems that I can continue to swim my skills/drills masters workouts. Maybe even include one USRPT/sprint workout? But running remains a black box. I was hoping to really focus on running this winter, especially form and it seems maybe I can do that but sprints/interval training are out of the question or maybe only once a week if I don't so my swim sprints. I'm going to give it a shot though. If I feel like I can handle it or I'm pushing myself towards overtraining I'll simply stop and go back to my regular weight training.
But one weight training session a week is so appealing. I hates weight training and now that I don't have my boot camp class it's all the more difficult to stay motivated.
And this sounds like it could be a great program for agility people looking to get into shape and/or people who hate to exercise or are very pressed for time. In perusing online forums and blogs about the program it seems that anecdotally there are people having success. Seems like the biggest issue is that the program is centered around the notion of pushing the muscle to failure and that for some people this can be difficult to achieve unless you have a coach or training partner at your session with you. And also that you can eventually develop an aversion to the training because it is so hard and unpleasant and this was my experience with the Tabata sprints experiment. Even though the workout was very short I'd start dreading it an hour beforehand. But I'm open minded here, mind over matter or whatever. I'm hoping to start this Saturday and I'll post updates.
Thursday, November 13, 2014
And the Award for 'Worst Nutrition Advice on the Internets' Goes to . . .
USA Triathlon and their article on how we should all eat more bread and wheat and gluten and white flour. I don't even know where to start with this, makes my head want to explode. And the author is a coach and registered dietician which only adds to my conviction that registered dieticians are the absolute very last people we should be listening to. Her main argument is that bread contains B vitamins, iron and fiber and we all need those things. And it's true that bread contains those things if the flour has been enriched. But you know what else contains those things? Vegetables. And they contain about 3-4 times the amount that bread has. The bread I used to buy, Rudy's Organic Colorado Cracked Wheat, contains 6% US RDA of iron and 8% fiber. A cup of cooked spinach contains 36% iron and 17% fiber plus a whole lot of other vitamins and minerals and other good stuffs. And no gluten. Various types of meats and seafood are also way higher in iron and B vitamins, some like liver and mollusks provide 129-155% iron. And no gluten.
Which brings me to perhaps the most aggravating claim in the article, that, "Most of us (97 percent) digest wheat and its protein, gluten, just fine," when in fact 0% of us digest wheat gluten. This week I've been immersing myself in free online lectures at the Autoimmune Summit and pretty much every single expert lists giving up gluten as the number one thing you can do to help with an autoimmune disease. And so far pretty much all the practitioners I've heard speak have said that all their patients with autoimmune diseases also have gluten sensitivity (and not necessarily celiac disease which very few people have). The only lab in the country that tests extensively for gluten sensitivity is Cyrex and it's mostly functional medicine doctors that order these tests, not conventional MD's. You can have gluten sensitivity and not have GI symptoms. And you maybe can tolerate gluten until suddenly maybe you can't. I know, people love to roll their eyes when you mention gluten. They call it a fad and it'll go away. Except I don't think it's going to. Only going to get worse as the generations march on. Even South Park gets it.
So yeah, let's eat more bread and pasta and nutrient poor processed food. Because the obesity and diabetes levels in this country aren't high enough.
Edited to add:
A quick Google search of the author reveals that her 'primary areas of expertise include focus group moderating and meeting facilitation' and that her 'clients include the grocery industry, leading food companies, and public relations firms. She has worked closely with government agencies, trade associations, and other non-governmental organizations.' So yeah, it's her job to promote the food industry and make them look not so evil. So important to vet the sources of nutrition info. on the nets. Shame on USA Triathlon for serving as a vehicle for the food industry though I can't say I'm surprised.
Which brings me to perhaps the most aggravating claim in the article, that, "Most of us (97 percent) digest wheat and its protein, gluten, just fine," when in fact 0% of us digest wheat gluten. This week I've been immersing myself in free online lectures at the Autoimmune Summit and pretty much every single expert lists giving up gluten as the number one thing you can do to help with an autoimmune disease. And so far pretty much all the practitioners I've heard speak have said that all their patients with autoimmune diseases also have gluten sensitivity (and not necessarily celiac disease which very few people have). The only lab in the country that tests extensively for gluten sensitivity is Cyrex and it's mostly functional medicine doctors that order these tests, not conventional MD's. You can have gluten sensitivity and not have GI symptoms. And you maybe can tolerate gluten until suddenly maybe you can't. I know, people love to roll their eyes when you mention gluten. They call it a fad and it'll go away. Except I don't think it's going to. Only going to get worse as the generations march on. Even South Park gets it.
So yeah, let's eat more bread and pasta and nutrient poor processed food. Because the obesity and diabetes levels in this country aren't high enough.
Edited to add:
A quick Google search of the author reveals that her 'primary areas of expertise include focus group moderating and meeting facilitation' and that her 'clients include the grocery industry, leading food companies, and public relations firms. She has worked closely with government agencies, trade associations, and other non-governmental organizations.' So yeah, it's her job to promote the food industry and make them look not so evil. So important to vet the sources of nutrition info. on the nets. Shame on USA Triathlon for serving as a vehicle for the food industry though I can't say I'm surprised.
Wednesday, November 05, 2014
On Strike
Been enjoying my off season/recovery month. Perfect weather, the nicest fall I can remember ever, anywhere. Lots of hiking, walks w/ dogs, Kangoo jump boots, even some agility - I know, shock horror. I've been doing my strength training at the playground. Very fun. Very challenging. First time I tried it I did 20 minutes worth and it felt like nothing then I woke up the next morning and couldn't move for 2 days. Lots of little experiments planned. Too many in fact, had to cut down and I think the first one getting the axe for now is ketosis. Partly because I'd have to pony up just over $100 for a ketosis meter but mostly because - Sweet Potato Season! I love sweet potatoes. But they don't go with ketosis so much. Again I could buy a meter and see how much if any I could eat and stay in ketosis but . . . yeah, too much money and hassle for now. It's still on my list of experiments, just moved to the bottom.
The big thing I'm working on right now is my running. It's the one thing that didn't improve this year despite what felt like a lot of hard speed work. So I've decided to focus on form this fall and there are lots of methods to choose from. For now I've decided on Kelly Starrett's 'Ready to Run' book, hot off the presses.
He's a bit controversial I think, especially amongst triathlon folks/runners probably because his focus is Crossfit. But I like his 'systems approach' to running. He outlines 12 steps to take to prepare the body for running and these include mobility exercises for various systems of the body to improve range of motion, restore function, etc. I have a suspicion that these range of motion limitations are a big part of what's holding me back.
Step number 2 of this program involves building up strength in the foot by walking around barefoot when possible and otherwise wearing flat (zero drop), minimally or uncushioned shoes with the end result of being able to run in such shoes. And I suspect this will be the biggest issue for me because right now I have mega-cushioned stability shoes and custom orthotics. And despite several years of trying to change my stride I'm still a heel striker. Big time. My feet are not so fabulous either. I'll spare you the tedious details of all my issues but I've had foot surgery that included sawing through my big toe and reattaching it with pins and plates. And I've got broken sesmoid bones in both feet (the sesmoid bones are in the forefoot). So I've spent maybe 20 years avoiding landing on my forefoot in addition to 14 years of cushioned stability shoes and custom orthotics.
The podiatrist told me my foot problems arose as a result of wearing flat, unsupportive shoes so I'm very leery of drinking the Kool-Aid of minimalist running shoes. And don't even get me started about the myth of it's impossible to heel strike in a pair of uncushioned, flat shoes or while running barefoot. Because I just saw a video of an agility competitor running in 3 different styles of flat shoes including the Vibram 5 Fingers and she was heel striking in all 3 of them. One of the runners in the promo video for Kelly's own book is heel striking!
Check out the runner heel striking at around 44 seconds.
And how big of an issue is heel striking anyway? I honestly don't know. There are disadvantages to forefoot striking. Plus for me all the hardware and broken bones in my forefoot.
But I do like the idea of building up strength in my feet and if I have any complaints about the book so far it's that there are only mobility exercise for the foot, no specific foot strengthening exercises. You're supposed to rely on barefoot walking and minimalist shoe usage to build up the strength. So I set out yesterday to get a pair of cheapo flat gym shoes at the local Payless only to discover that it's fallen victim to the mansionification of Boulder, ie rich folk don't buy their shoes at Payless and Boulder is so overrun with rich folks. Middle class/working class pretty much gone. And real estate prices/rentals are going through the roof again. Not sure what I'm still doing here but that's a post for another day.
Anyway I ended up at Boulder Running Company which is the last place I wanted to end up somehow it sucked me in and I ended up with a ridiculously expensive pair of zero drop but minimally cushioned shoes.
Very comfy, very purple. I do love the purple. Probably too much cushion for what Kelly was intending but the only zero drop shoes in the joint and they're probably a good transition for me given all my issues. Something in between the super minimalist and the super cushion. Might not build up the foot strength as much at first but again maybe a good transition for now until I get used to the taste of the Kool-Aid.
But despite the minimal drop and lighter cushioning, I'm still heel striking though admittedly not nearly as bad as in my regular shoes.
First 2 clips are in regular shoes the rest are in the new shoes
The plan is baby steps. I'll spend 2 months just walking in these things, first just a mile on Lola's old dog walk then increasing gradually to a longer, faster Strummer walk. Then the protocol is for 10% of total distance and gradually increasing I think by 10% each week but I may go even slower than that. I'm going to wear them for my plyometrics and playground strength training as well. I'll shoot more video in a month or so to see if there's any improvement. There's definitely a change in stride with these shoes and I think I'll like it but I'll need to read more in the book to see what else is going on.
Oh for the days of being able to run around like a little kid without so much thought or risk of injury.
The big thing I'm working on right now is my running. It's the one thing that didn't improve this year despite what felt like a lot of hard speed work. So I've decided to focus on form this fall and there are lots of methods to choose from. For now I've decided on Kelly Starrett's 'Ready to Run' book, hot off the presses.
He's a bit controversial I think, especially amongst triathlon folks/runners probably because his focus is Crossfit. But I like his 'systems approach' to running. He outlines 12 steps to take to prepare the body for running and these include mobility exercises for various systems of the body to improve range of motion, restore function, etc. I have a suspicion that these range of motion limitations are a big part of what's holding me back.
Step number 2 of this program involves building up strength in the foot by walking around barefoot when possible and otherwise wearing flat (zero drop), minimally or uncushioned shoes with the end result of being able to run in such shoes. And I suspect this will be the biggest issue for me because right now I have mega-cushioned stability shoes and custom orthotics. And despite several years of trying to change my stride I'm still a heel striker. Big time. My feet are not so fabulous either. I'll spare you the tedious details of all my issues but I've had foot surgery that included sawing through my big toe and reattaching it with pins and plates. And I've got broken sesmoid bones in both feet (the sesmoid bones are in the forefoot). So I've spent maybe 20 years avoiding landing on my forefoot in addition to 14 years of cushioned stability shoes and custom orthotics.
The podiatrist told me my foot problems arose as a result of wearing flat, unsupportive shoes so I'm very leery of drinking the Kool-Aid of minimalist running shoes. And don't even get me started about the myth of it's impossible to heel strike in a pair of uncushioned, flat shoes or while running barefoot. Because I just saw a video of an agility competitor running in 3 different styles of flat shoes including the Vibram 5 Fingers and she was heel striking in all 3 of them. One of the runners in the promo video for Kelly's own book is heel striking!
Check out the runner heel striking at around 44 seconds.
And how big of an issue is heel striking anyway? I honestly don't know. There are disadvantages to forefoot striking. Plus for me all the hardware and broken bones in my forefoot.
But I do like the idea of building up strength in my feet and if I have any complaints about the book so far it's that there are only mobility exercise for the foot, no specific foot strengthening exercises. You're supposed to rely on barefoot walking and minimalist shoe usage to build up the strength. So I set out yesterday to get a pair of cheapo flat gym shoes at the local Payless only to discover that it's fallen victim to the mansionification of Boulder, ie rich folk don't buy their shoes at Payless and Boulder is so overrun with rich folks. Middle class/working class pretty much gone. And real estate prices/rentals are going through the roof again. Not sure what I'm still doing here but that's a post for another day.
Anyway I ended up at Boulder Running Company which is the last place I wanted to end up somehow it sucked me in and I ended up with a ridiculously expensive pair of zero drop but minimally cushioned shoes.
Very comfy, very purple. I do love the purple. Probably too much cushion for what Kelly was intending but the only zero drop shoes in the joint and they're probably a good transition for me given all my issues. Something in between the super minimalist and the super cushion. Might not build up the foot strength as much at first but again maybe a good transition for now until I get used to the taste of the Kool-Aid.
But despite the minimal drop and lighter cushioning, I'm still heel striking though admittedly not nearly as bad as in my regular shoes.
First 2 clips are in regular shoes the rest are in the new shoes
The plan is baby steps. I'll spend 2 months just walking in these things, first just a mile on Lola's old dog walk then increasing gradually to a longer, faster Strummer walk. Then the protocol is for 10% of total distance and gradually increasing I think by 10% each week but I may go even slower than that. I'm going to wear them for my plyometrics and playground strength training as well. I'll shoot more video in a month or so to see if there's any improvement. There's definitely a change in stride with these shoes and I think I'll like it but I'll need to read more in the book to see what else is going on.
Oh for the days of being able to run around like a little kid without so much thought or risk of injury.
Wednesday, October 01, 2014
The World Loses Another Great One Too Soon
RIP Dr. Sophia Yin. Her positive influence on the lives of dogs and their people is so far reaching and profound and will be sorely missed. Strummy and Lola are forever thankful for their beloved Treat Gizmo.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














